These are good theories but the Phoenicians were probably coming to America to exploit the copper mines. There are literally 1000's of ancient mine shafts that are estimated to have been in use during the mid Bronze age.Or could have been the Minoans or Egyptians.. So, i know better then. the Albans did indeed disappear, so it is likely that they came over to N.America,or maybe stopped at Iceland, maybe Greenland. Yet with obvious artifacts like the Chinese-type petroglyphs and similar mythologies in Central and South America who is to say they didnt first trek the Northern areas? what about the Kush (Nubians), which were the black Egyptians. and the giant Olmec heads that are clearly African?!? I believe its fact the Norse made it here, there are sagas and records of that, though they werent welcome.We may never know, but then the "common" beliefs" are mostly wrong anyway, and theres proof of that ,too!
Fine theories which may never come to be documented. Mowat introduced me to the word "first-footers."
Reviewers are missing his "dream time" history of the Albans. They abandoned the Atlantic coast of Europe -- probably under pressure of the arriving Celts with their superior tool kit for farming. Mowat calls them Armoricans who subsequently are his Albans in Britain.
It seems to me more likely that the American continents received their name from the Armoricans who navigated and exploited the waters where Phoenicians established no trading entrepots. Why would Europeans name their New World after the first name of the parochial explorer Amerigo Vespucci? "[He] was the first to describe the Western Hemisphere as a previously unknown [!] continent rather than as part of Asia." No one can claim a first -- only that no earlier account has been found. Also, first in writing is not necessarily the first account, which was oral and unwritten. A 1507 map and treatise (in Latin) "was the first to use the name America ... for the region ..." Again, first in writing as far as we know. (Quotes are from Grolier Encyclopedia of Knowledge.) The Armoricans were preliterate but not ignorant.
By the way, place names called Alba- appear sporadically across Europe to the Caucasus.
The English remember a time when their land was called Albion -- the first-footers before the Celts arrived? Otherwise, what did these people call themselves, and what did the arriving Celts call them?
At a time, Romans used the name Albania for the region of Georgia on the Caspian Sea alongside the Roman Empire. Similarly, the Elbe River, Olbia, Sardinia, Olbia on the Black Sea. Possibly the Alps.
It is believed by some that the Basque language is a remnant of a European speech community who followed the retreating glaciers, quite a while before Indo-Europeans arrived. The hypothesis of Armoricans resembles a community who followed the retreating glaciers as first-footers.
There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.